Civil War Essay: The Major Contributing Factors to the Civil War Essay

If asked, just about people would blame as the cause of the courteous war the issue of bondage. This is understandable many people in the U.S. at the time were against thraldom, going to far as to help runaway slaves skirt to the free north. But, while slavery at face value was a major factor, international politics and economics played a major role. Several factors, including the election of capital of Nebraska, the raid on harpists Ferry, the Dred Scott decision, and, most of the essence(p)ly, the fugitive slave law, contri simplyed to the growing suspension amongst the northern and siemens and, eventually, the Civil War.Abraham Lincoln is most always associated with the Civil War. But, he was non elected through a majority of the popular vote. In fact, with completely forty percent of the popular vote, he wasnt even good to a majority. His Republican platform reached out to many groups, but left hand out the sulphurwest. Many southerners thought he was an aboli tionist, although he did favor pecuniary compensation and a Union. As a result of southern fears all over Lincoln, he was non allowed on the ballot in ten southern states, and many states threatened to secede if he was elected. His election prompted the first state, South Carolina, to secede from the Union, and started the Civil War.This contributed to the growing rift greatly, in that the South not completely felt their livelihoods were being threatened through the potential mischief of their slaves, but also had a sense of disenfranchisement at the polls, because the minority vista won. But, even though if Lincoln had not been elected, the Civil War would watch been delayed, Lincoln was really just the straw that broke the camels back. The south was looking for an excuse to secede, and Lincoln gave it too him, which makes this election a relatively minor event in contributing to the civil war.But, while Lincoln was the straw, the labor union had placed many other burdens o n the Souths proverbial camel. In 1859, abolitionist John dark-brown decided to take on to incite a slave uprising. At Harpers Ferry, Brown attacked an arsenal. The result was seven people dead, no slave uprising (they were not aware of the endeavor), and John Brown martyred for the abolitionist cause. Zealous abolitionists praised Brown, but southerners proverb him as a murderer. What angered the south most, however, was not that a rabid murdered seven people, but that abolitionists in the North financed him. The rift widened betwixt the North and South for southerners, who believed there was a conspiracy in the North to send armed gangs to steal slaves and murder innocent people. The Raid on Harpers Ferry added more to the growing fissure in the midst of the North and the South than Lincolns election.Whereas the Raid on Harpers Ferry increased tensions in the south, the Dred Scott Decision worried the North. Dred Scott was a black slave on free district who sued for his fre edom. The Supreme act ruled that he was not a citizen, but also include the more comprehensive judgment that slaves could be taken into any territory and held in slavery. Northern abolitionists were shocked their plan for compromise was no more slavery in any territory, and this ruling shut down their cause. Abolitionists feared that slavery would now spread into more territories, and Northern democrats, who favored popular sovereignty, and southern democrats, who favored slavery, were divided further in the Dred Scott Decision. This case contributed to the division of the classless Party, who then nominated three separate candidates, resulted in the election of Lincoln, and stupefy in motion the secessions that caused the Civil War.Although Dred Scott did frighten many abolitionists, the most important contributor to the growing rift between the North and the South was the fleeting slave law. This law empowered every person to act as a slave catcher, forbid anyone from helping an alleged slave, and allowed slave owners to only state ownership of the slave in question in vow to take him into custody. While originally a political move to compose the south, the result was a widening rift. The South was angered by a widespread refusal of Northerners to execute the law, another northern conspiracy to disenfranchise the south.The North was angered because they were being forced to go against their principles, against their deepest beliefs, and send fugitive slaves, or even freeborn blacks, back to the south. The northerners were forced to choose between fixed by the law, and helping a fellow human being. It put a human face on slavery for northerners, and polarized the two regions. The Fugitive Slave law was the most significant factor in contributing to the rift between the North and the South, and, ultimately, the Civil War.The Civil War had numerous, complicated causes. The tensions between the manufacturing North and the agrarian South had been growing for decades before it rose to a boil in 1861. Slavery was a major factor, both politically and morally. The Civil War kept the Union together, at the cost of thousands of lives, but at the same time resulted in a new lead on life for thousands of slaves. The Fugitive Slave Law, the election of Lincoln, the raid at Harpers Ferry, and the Dred Scott decision all contributed to the Civil War, and thus, to the ending of slavery in America