Analysis of A Passage to India by E. M. Forster :: passage india forster essays papers

Analysis of A Passage to India by ForsterForsters novel A Passage to India portrays a colonial India under British rule, before its liberation. For conveniences sake, horse opera civilization has created an Other as counterpart to itself, and a set of characteristics to go with it. An us versus them attitude is exemplified in Forsters representation of The Other. Separation of the British and the Indian exists a wide cultural lines, specifically religious/spiritual differences. Savage or ungodly cultures were to be assimilated into or at the least governed by Christians, and converted. The musical interval between the English and the Indian occurs when the Christian assumes the Indians are an ungodly people, in need of spiritual salvation, a race below their own, and entirely hostile them. This was demonstrated historically by the dominance of supposedly inferior races by the Christians (English). Forsters Indians have a seemingly rugged outward appearance. They are a godless peop le insomuchas they do non believe in the Christian GOD, even though there are two religions, Hinduism and Muslimism, which thrive in India. This division of Indias religions, as opposed to Englands presumably unifying religion, separates England from India even moreso. Because the Indians do not believe in the Christian GOD, they are unrecognized as spiritual. Religion shapes, if not embodies characterization. The British are British because of their religion, i.e. Ronny Heaslop is who he is because he is a white Christian British male. How he is outwardly splendid is a construct of his Christian upbringing. Ronny approved of religion as long as it endorsed the National Anthem of England. (p. 65) His purpose, as was the purpose of English colonialists, was constructed by his Christian beliefs. If Ronny were not English (and for this papers purposes, English is specifically and continually joined with Christianity) he would not exist as a character. He is close to a caricature o f what is English, and is represented wholly by the standards and beliefs of that culture. In contrast, Aziz would not exists if he were not Indian, representing wholly the standards and beliefs of that culture. Forster implies that the division, the Other, is what makes an individual who they are. Spirituality is integral to that existence.The Indian people are further represented in the Englishs eyes by the description of India itself. The city, presumably a mark of civilization, is a rotting, festering affaire that no English colonialist would consider urbane